Advocating Progress: The Religion of Business


politicalprof:

So I’ve been trying to get my head around this phenomenon of businesses like the Hobby Lobby claiming that since the owner has a religious objection to contraception, he should not be required to provide insurance to his employees that covers contraception — especially things…

The fallacy of the original post is the assumption that the purpose of the freedom of religion post is to protect organised religions. It’s not. It’s there to protect the freedom of individual conscience. It means that the government cannot force you do do something that violates your most deeply held beliefs. The societies that have allowed Governments to overrule individual conscience have been and are the most oppressive and horrifying regimes in history.

Early in the morning, the day after Americans awarded him four more years in the White House, President Obama gave his acceptance speech then sought détente immediately by calling GOP Speaker of the House John Boehner and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell. Johnny and Mitch rebuffed him. They were asleep, Barack Obama was informed. They would not be roused to speak to the likes of the President of the United States.

Then, the day after Americans voted to reject Mitt Romney’s plan to reduce the deficit on the back of the middle class, Johnny and Mitch insisted that Congress must reduce the deficit on the back of the middle class. Johnny and Mitch need to wake up to the new reality.

Ding, dang, dong. Republicans lost. They lost the Presidency. They lost seats in both the House and the Senate. The American people smacked Republicans down and trounced the GOP’s darling Tea Party. Losers don’t disrespect the victors. And, Johnny and Mitch, just FYI, losers don’t dictate the terms of armistice. The victor in the 2012 Presidential election ran on a pledge not to renew those expiring Bush tax cuts for the rich. American voters validated those terms.


Leo Gerard, president of the United Steelworkers, in Wake Up, Boehner. Morning Bells Are Ringing: The Dems Won - In These Times (via tartantambourine)

~~~

Let me quickly explain how a representative democracy works.  People vote for who they want to represent their interests, opinions and beliefs, and those representatives faithfully represent those interests, opinions and beleifs.  Just because a particular party got less votes than the other does not mean that they are required to abandon their positions and the people that voted for them. 

The Republicans won the house of congress by a decisive margin after Obama was elected but no one expected the Demoncrats in the congress or Obama to abondon those who voted for them.

(via reagan-was-a-horrible-president)

Really? 18 months ago I thought it was only for the 99%….

Really? 18 months ago I thought it was only for the 99%….

(Source: barackobama, via reagan-was-a-horrible-president)

And yet, it’s conservatives that we are always told are full of hate….

And yet, it’s conservatives that we are always told are full of hate….

(Source: dirtypoliticsconfessions)

truth-has-a-liberal-bias:

ilovecharts:

News Coverage of Debates Matters More Than the Debates Themselves

Ugh. That is wrong on so many levels.

It doesn’t occur to anyone that the different networks news might attract difference veiwing demographics?

truth-has-a-liberal-bias:

ilovecharts:

News Coverage of Debates Matters More Than the Debates Themselves

Ugh. That is wrong on so many levels.

It doesn’t occur to anyone that the different networks news might attract difference veiwing demographics?

(via reagan-was-a-horrible-president)

proudblackconservative:

HOW DARE YOU? I identify as a cow. Therefore I am a cow. 

There are types of birds that lay their eggs in the nests of birds of other species.  Those poor unsuspecting birds raise the foreign chick as if it was their own. 
That is absurd yes, but it is not unnatural. 
Why is human milking of cows any less natural?

proudblackconservative:

HOW DARE YOU? I identify as a cow. Therefore I am a cow. 

There are types of birds that lay their eggs in the nests of birds of other species.  Those poor unsuspecting birds raise the foreign chick as if it was their own. 

That is absurd yes, but it is not unnatural. 

Why is human milking of cows any less natural?

(Source: veganpizzabody)

“The math behind how (Mitt) Romney can give everyone a 20 percent tax cut without bankrupting the government is just way too advanced for us regular folks to understand. It’s unfathomably complex, like string theory. You’d have to grasp that the universe is actually eleven co-existent dimensions — eight of which are where Romney shelters his wealth.”

STEPHEN COLBERT, remarking on Paul Ryan’s inability to explain Romney’s tax plan because “it would take me too long to go through all the math,” on The Colbert Report (via inothernews)

Actually the concept is so simple that even a liberals used to be able to understand it.

“Lower rates of taxation will stimulate economic activity and so raise the levels of personal and corporate income as to yield within a few years an increased – not a reduced – flow of revenues to the federal government.”

– John F. Kennedy, Jan. 17, 1963, annual budget message to the Congress, fiscal year 1964

The amount of money collected in taxes is not fixed.  People react to changes in taxation. 

If you raise taxes then many people and companies will simply invest their money in other countries where the taxes are not as high. If taxes get high enough the rich people will leave the country altogether taking their money and jobs with them.  This causes government revenues to fall.

The inverse is also true. If you lower taxes companies and individuals will set up shop in your country, bringing their jobs with them. This increases government revenues.

(via reagan-was-a-horrible-president)

Many people take issue with someone whose first instinct is not to condemn a group of people that stormed an embassy, killed an ambassador, and dragged his dead body through the street, but to condemn the poorly made video that supposedly provoked them.
What the Obama administration was doing was far worse than sympathizing.  They were kowtowing to the violent mob. 

Many people take issue with someone whose first instinct is not to condemn a group of people that stormed an embassy, killed an ambassador, and dragged his dead body through the street, but to condemn the poorly made video that supposedly provoked them.

What the Obama administration was doing was far worse than sympathizing.  They were kowtowing to the violent mob. 

(Source: sarahlee310, via reagan-was-a-horrible-president)

“I worked extremely hard… I take credit for the work. But I received a free education. I received free health care… I’m unapologetic about saying this,” she added. “I had pneumonia when my daughter was under one year old. If we hadn’t had free health care in this country, God only knows what would have happened to either of us. I am proud of having done what I’ve done. Very proud. But. I do take issue – and this does go to the heart of this book, which is why I have to say it—with anyone who truly feels it’s a 100 percent down to them.”

J.K. Rowling: ‘I didn’t build this’ on my own - She The People - The Washington Post (via sarahlee310)

The logic that people like JK miss is that universal health care, education, roads bridges and other factors that may have contributed to their success, are available to everyone.  Once you take out these common factors, all success of the individual is down to the abilities of that person.

The English people provided education for everyone.  But Rowling was the only person that built a billion dollar empire out of it. 

Likewise paper, pens and word processing tools are available to everyone. But only one person wrote a best selling story about an orphaned wizard.

(via reagan-was-a-horrible-president)

thepoliticalfreakshow:

Here’s the story behind the picture:

Mitt Romney changed his story on poverty in St. Louis Thursday. Where in February, during the GOP primary, he said “I’m not concerned about the very poor,” today he called rising poverty rates “a moral failure” – and blamed it on President Obama. But Romney supports Paul Ryan’s budget, which would slash food stamps, Head Start, Medicaid, nutrition programs for pregnant women and their children, and his tax plan would raise taxes on the poor and working class while giving himself an extra $5 million or so. Mitt, you got it right the first time: You’re not concerned about the very poor.
But Romney’s shifting stories on his Vietnam status could have real political consequences, as an Associated Press expose revealing that he sought and got four deferments from military service during the Vietnam War gets more play. It’s not the deferments that will hurt – Dick Cheney got five. It’s the fact that over the years, Romney has lied about it.
AP politely says his story has “evolved,” but tracks the puzzling changes. Running for president in 2007, Romney told the Boston Globe, “I longed in many respects to actually be in Vietnam and be representing our country there, and in some ways it was frustrating not to feel like I was there as part of the troops that were fighting in Vietnam.”
But in 1994, running against Ted Kennedy for his Massachusetts Senate seat while in his “I’m not a typical Republican” phase, he admitted “it was not my desire to go off and serve in Vietnam.” Fair enough: His father, George Romney, turned against the war, and so did a lot of Republicans (even if party hawks would later try to hang the “loss” of Vietnam on the antiwar left and their Democratic enablers). Indeed, in 1970, at 23, Romney told the Globe, ”If it wasn’t a political blunder to move into Vietnam, I don’t know what is.”
But while telling the truth about his lack of “desire to go off and serve” in 1994, Romney lied again, telling the Boston Herald he didn’t “take any actions to remove myself from the pool of young men who were eligible for the draft.” That’s absolutely not true. He got his first deferment while at Stanford University, where in his prep-school prankster phase he counter-protested a Vietnam draft protest. That’s another lie, in a way: While posing as pro-draft and pro-war, he was evading the draft with an “activity in study” deferment. After his freshman year, he got deferment status as “a minister of religion or divinity student,” which he’d keep while working in France as a missionary for his Mormon church.
Yet the AP reveals that other young Mormons were denied that deferment. And since the church itself strongly supported the war, its leaders eventually limited such deferments, but Romney kept his.
After his religious deferment, he got another academic deferment to finish school. By the time he was draft eligible, troop numbers were declining, and his lottery number was never called.
As Rachel Maddow noted last night, this story got eclipsed by post-Wisconsin coverage, but Romney’s dissembling here, all captured in newspapers in real time, should be a real problem for him. Especially since he’s getting the old George W. Bush band back together and backing the Bush-Cheney neocon foreign policy that never saw a war it didn’t like.  His campaign refused to comment on the AP story. Let’s see if Romney has to answer for his Vietnam deceit in the days to come.
I talked about the story on MSNBC’s “Bashir Live” today. As a bonus, you can see me tell Bashir I can’t answer a question, when he asks me why veterans are supporting Romney over Obama 66-34 percent. I started to BS, and then decided to keep a promise to myself that I won’t make things up when I really don’t know the truth. A little cringe-making, but better than faking it.

Mitt is a draft-dodger who doesn’t give a damn about America’s servicemen and servicewomen. Plain and simple!!!

Oh, I didn’t realise that Obama served in Vietnam?

thepoliticalfreakshow:

Here’s the story behind the picture:

Mitt Romney changed his story on poverty in St. Louis Thursday. Where in February, during the GOP primary, he said “I’m not concerned about the very poor,” today he called rising poverty rates “a moral failure” – and blamed it on President Obama. But Romney supports Paul Ryan’s budget, which would slash food stamps, Head Start, Medicaid, nutrition programs for pregnant women and their children, and his tax plan would raise taxes on the poor and working class while giving himself an extra $5 million or so. Mitt, you got it right the first time: You’re not concerned about the very poor.

But Romney’s shifting stories on his Vietnam status could have real political consequences, as an Associated Press expose revealing that he sought and got four deferments from military service during the Vietnam War gets more play. It’s not the deferments that will hurt – Dick Cheney got five. It’s the fact that over the years, Romney has lied about it.

AP politely says his story has “evolved,” but tracks the puzzling changes. Running for president in 2007, Romney told the Boston Globe, “I longed in many respects to actually be in Vietnam and be representing our country there, and in some ways it was frustrating not to feel like I was there as part of the troops that were fighting in Vietnam.”

But in 1994, running against Ted Kennedy for his Massachusetts Senate seat while in his “I’m not a typical Republican” phase, he admitted “it was not my desire to go off and serve in Vietnam.” Fair enough: His father, George Romney, turned against the war, and so did a lot of Republicans (even if party hawks would later try to hang the “loss” of Vietnam on the antiwar left and their Democratic enablers). Indeed, in 1970, at 23, Romney told the Globe, ”If it wasn’t a political blunder to move into Vietnam, I don’t know what is.”

But while telling the truth about his lack of “desire to go off and serve” in 1994, Romney lied again, telling the Boston Herald he didn’t “take any actions to remove myself from the pool of young men who were eligible for the draft.” That’s absolutely not true. He got his first deferment while at Stanford University, where in his prep-school prankster phase he counter-protested a Vietnam draft protest. That’s another lie, in a way: While posing as pro-draft and pro-war, he was evading the draft with an “activity in study” deferment. After his freshman year, he got deferment status as “a minister of religion or divinity student,” which he’d keep while working in France as a missionary for his Mormon church.

Yet the AP reveals that other young Mormons were denied that deferment. And since the church itself strongly supported the war, its leaders eventually limited such deferments, but Romney kept his.

After his religious deferment, he got another academic deferment to finish school. By the time he was draft eligible, troop numbers were declining, and his lottery number was never called.

As Rachel Maddow noted last night, this story got eclipsed by post-Wisconsin coverage, but Romney’s dissembling here, all captured in newspapers in real time, should be a real problem for him. Especially since he’s getting the old George W. Bush band back together and backing the Bush-Cheney neocon foreign policy that never saw a war it didn’t like.  His campaign refused to comment on the AP story. Let’s see if Romney has to answer for his Vietnam deceit in the days to come.

I talked about the story on MSNBC’s “Bashir Live” today. As a bonus, you can see me tell Bashir I can’t answer a question, when he asks me why veterans are supporting Romney over Obama 66-34 percent. I started to BS, and then decided to keep a promise to myself that I won’t make things up when I really don’t know the truth. A little cringe-making, but better than faking it.

Mitt is a draft-dodger who doesn’t give a damn about America’s servicemen and servicewomen. Plain and simple!!!

Oh, I didn’t realise that Obama served in Vietnam?

(via reagan-was-a-horrible-president)